AVAILABILITY OF PASSENGER TRANSPORT FOR THE PUBLIC FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF TARIFF FORMATION
https://doi.org/10.33815/2313-4763.2023.1-2.26-27.107-118
Abstract
The lagging behind the development of passenger transport from the needs of the population in movement causes socio-economic problems and negatively affects the work of other branches of the city's economy. The operation of public transport is an important indicator of the quality of life in the city and one of the criteria for evaluating the performance of local authorities. When organizing passenger transportation, it is necessary to conduct a competent price policy, since the financial stability of transport enterprises depends on it. For a significant part of the population, transportation costs account for a significant share of total consumer spending. Passenger transport affects the transport accessibility of regions, the level of transport mobility of the population and the well-being of citizens - they have great social significance. The work shows that with the help of the developed model of finding the estimated tariff for passenger transportation, passenger transport enterprises can determine the necessary number of flights and units of rolling stock to maintain the quality of transportation at the appropriate level. At the same time, you can choose the required capacity of the rolling stock, when the tariff for passenger transportation will be minimal, and the quality of service will be within a satisfactory level. From the point of view of economic expediency, passenger transportation must be organized in such a way as to provide the population with the necessary communications, while energy, financial and other resources must be effectively used at the required level of quality service. The clearly expressed socially significant nature of the work of public passenger transport should be supported by the guarantee of high quality transportation for the least well-off categories of passengers. It is proved that when determining the amount of the tariff for passenger transportation, it is necessary to take into account the principles of the tariff policy in the organization of passenger transportation and evaluate it in the complex of measures of socio-economic development of the region, and not only according to the income of transport enterprises.
References
2. Tkach, V. A., Lubyanoy, P. V., Voytovich, O. A. (2020). Model' vnedreniya dopolnitel'nykh ostanovok gorodskogo passazhirskogo transporta. Vestnik Khersonskogo natsional'nogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta – №4(75). – S. 20–27.
3. Lubyanoy, P. V., AntonyakМ P. O. (2023). Formirovaniye ratsional'noy skhemy oplaty za predostavleniye uslug po perevozke passazhirov v gorodakh. Sinergiya nauki i biznesa v poslevoyennom obnovlenii khersonshchiny materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 26–28 aprelya 2023 g. V dvukh tomakh Tom 2 S. 302–306.
4. Ponkratov, D. P. (2020). Formalizatsiya vzaimosvyazi mezhdu pokazatelyami urovnya zapolneniya gorodskikh passazhirskikh transportnykh sredstv. Kommunal'noye khozyaystvo gorodov. Khar'kov. T. 6. № 152. S. 196–203.
5. Otchet o nauchno-issledovatel'skoy rabote (2021). «Obsledovaniye passazhiropotokov na gorodskikh avtobusnykh i trolleybusnykh marshrutakh obshchego ispol'zovaniya v g. Kherson»; KHNTU dogovor ot 23.07. № 148 – 2021 – 51 s.
6. Makarenko, V. D., Lubyanoy, P. V., Voytovich, A. A. (2023). Kachestvo passazhirskikh transportnykh uslug na baze nefinansovykh kharakteristik. VESTNIK KHNTU № 1(84). S. 48–55.
7. Rea, J. C. Designing Urban Transit Systems: Na prilozhenii k Route Technology Selection Problem. V Highway Research Record 417, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1972, P. 49–61.
8. Sharp, G. P. (1974). Public Transit System Network Models: Konsul'tatsiya po stroitel'stvu, Paskhengeru puteshestviya i Dolgosrochnomu kontinentu i Avtomobil'naya Scheduling Cost.Ph.D. dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
9. Hsu, J. and Surti, V. H. (1977). Unichtozheniye prilozheniy k bus net – rabota dizayna, perevozka stroitel'nykh materialov ASCE, Vol. 103, P. 447–439.
10. Juskevicius, P., Valeika, V., Burinskiene, M., Paliulis, G. (2006). Lithuanian urban transport systems, Klaipeda:monograph. Vilnius: Technika. – 181 p.
11. Small, Kenneth A. (1992). Urban transportation economics. Philadelphia, Penn.: Harwood Academic Publisher.
12. Oleynik, N. M., Makarenko, S. M. (2021). Osobennosti ispol'zovaniya metodov biznes-analiza po obespecheniyu ekonomicheskoy ustoychivosti i ustoychivomu razvitiyu predpriyatiya. Metody i instrumenty analiza i prognozirovaniya rynochnoy situatsii v obespechenii ustoychivosti sub"yektov khozyaystvovaniya: monografiya / pod obshch. red. N.V. Shandovoy. Kherson: OLDI-PLYUS. 280 s.
13. Ponkratov, D., Gyuleyev, N., Voronko, V., Ostashevskiy, S., Psol, S., Bugayov, I. (2020). Razvitiye modeley dlya pooshchreniya driver's failurefree operation in transportation system under conditions of traffic congestion. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. №3, P. 24–38. Rezhim dostupu:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081979671&doi=10.15587%2f1729-4061.2020.194449&partnerID=40&md5=ea68bf4fa8fc beca31192ace21825a82.
14. Ponkratov, D., Davidich, Y., Kopytkov, D., Samchuk, G., Kush, Y. (2023). Public Transit Crowding Estimation Indicators: comparative analysis, Conditions of Application, Interaction. In International Conference on Smart Technologies v Urban Engineering. Lecture Notes v Networks and Systems. Vol. 536. P. 764–774. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85144237140&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Public+transit+crowding+estimation+in dicators%3a+comparative+analysis%2c+ conditions+of+application%2c+interaction&sid=b551781d5d7484e385b7c420598edf04&sot=b& sdt=b&sl=122&s=TITLE-ABS KEY%28Public+transit+crowtions+of+application%2c+interaction %29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm.
15. Khorbakhov, P., Makarikhev, O., Svichinskiy, S., Ivanov, I. (2022). Framework dlya proyektirovaniya skhemy torgovykh resursov dlya transportnoy pomoshchi modelirovaniya v gorodakh. Transportation, 2022, 49(1), p. 115–136. https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007/s11116-021-10168-6.
